[center]
And why are we back on this old chestnut?
[/center]
well, the debate had reached the stage that we had mostly agreed that this picture was set up as a demonstration for the motorcycle show, London, with a dummy on the bike. What were we thinking?
Firstly, look at all the equipment in the picture. If this was for a show, you would want people to see the bike, so there would be no point in putting all the foreground stuff in which frames the picture, just fan at the back and bike in front would be the best option.
Secondly, looking at the shadows, the tunnel looks well lit, so the problem of the blades not looking still with flash photography falls down as I expect flash was not needed.
Thirdly, the whole setup does not look gleaming and pretty as it would for a show at that time, it just looks like a well used and slightly tatty wind tunnel.
Fourthly, (and my favourite!) I was looking through a copy of Motorcycle Mechanics from November 1968 for the article where Gander & Gray rebuilt a Meteor Minor, when I came across the header for the Magazines 'Technical Topics'. It had the following picture, where the 'dummy' is leaning over, apparently watching an adjustment to the motorcycle.
[center]

[/center]
so... I now feel strongly that the pictures
are the wind tunnel at Bristol's works and that the article made reference to it when doing the report on the London motorcycle show.
IN OTHER NEWS... Having mentioned the magazine, anybody wishing to read the Grey Gander's meteor 500 re-build
just click here. This article will pop up in Kevin's Corner later today.