- Fri Aug 11, 2017 2:59 pm
#7606
I am struggling to get enough braking effort from my front twin leading shoe brake on my 500 Enfields. I read the previous post where Tim suggested that a correctly set up TLS brake could be perfectly adequate (and I see no reason to dispute that).
Back in my world, with two of these brakes fitted to different bikes, I am strugling to get any serious stopping power.
The story so far -
I bought new relined shoes.(Hitchcocks improved type)
I bought a new, later, "improved geometry" brake plate.
I carefully set up the linkage making sure both shoes are activated together, and a near square angle is presented between the lever and the cable.
I rounded and polished the cams, as the sharp corner often digs in to the plate on the shoe causing friction and wear.
In desperation, I tried removing the link mechanism all together and constructing levers so that the outer cable terminated on the upper lever, and the inner cable terminated on the lower lever. This provided extra braking (by doubling the mechanical advantage, and thereby lever movement) this required very close adjustment, which revealed that my drum was not round. Sadly this experiment also explained why this simple arrangement is not used. There is no self centring for the brakes in the off position, which results in one shoe always dragging on the drum and gently cooking it.
I fitted a new wheel.
I fitted a new stainless brake linkage and set up nicely
I wondered about friction in the pivot bearings, so fitted needle rollers in the pivots.
The previous thread mentioned turning the shoes to get a better fit, so (not having a handy lathe) I removed the shoes, spotted the high spots from wear, and gently filed them away. Refit the shoes and use heavily for several miles. Remove and repeat process until a significant proportion of both shoes show marks from contacting the drum. Take on a 100 mile run out in the hills to bed in.
net result the front brake still feels dangerously inadequate and the tendons in my forearm are beginning to strain.
I believe that a brake this size should be capable of locking the front wheel. (maybe not repeatedly in short succession, but once at least). I had a similar problem with my Bonneville disc brakes, until I found appropriate pads and this will now lock the front wheel at any speed with two fingers on the lever. (also now very dangerous after spending a day riding an Enfield)
I can only think of one explanation, and that is that the lining materiel does not have a high enough coefficient of friction.
I believe that with any given geometry on a leading shoe there is a maximum coefficient of friction, at which point the servo action just locks the brake on, but I don't believe I am anywhere near approaching that point.
Does anyone know please what materiel is used for the Hitchcocks "improved" shoes ? or what coefficient of friction it has ?
Does anyone know of a materiel with higher coefficient of friction ?
Does anyone know where shoes with this can be obtained or constructed ?
I am guessing that racers might use compounds not suited to road use ?
Many thanks,
Mike
Back in my world, with two of these brakes fitted to different bikes, I am strugling to get any serious stopping power.
The story so far -
I bought new relined shoes.(Hitchcocks improved type)
I bought a new, later, "improved geometry" brake plate.
I carefully set up the linkage making sure both shoes are activated together, and a near square angle is presented between the lever and the cable.
I rounded and polished the cams, as the sharp corner often digs in to the plate on the shoe causing friction and wear.
In desperation, I tried removing the link mechanism all together and constructing levers so that the outer cable terminated on the upper lever, and the inner cable terminated on the lower lever. This provided extra braking (by doubling the mechanical advantage, and thereby lever movement) this required very close adjustment, which revealed that my drum was not round. Sadly this experiment also explained why this simple arrangement is not used. There is no self centring for the brakes in the off position, which results in one shoe always dragging on the drum and gently cooking it.
I fitted a new wheel.
I fitted a new stainless brake linkage and set up nicely
I wondered about friction in the pivot bearings, so fitted needle rollers in the pivots.
The previous thread mentioned turning the shoes to get a better fit, so (not having a handy lathe) I removed the shoes, spotted the high spots from wear, and gently filed them away. Refit the shoes and use heavily for several miles. Remove and repeat process until a significant proportion of both shoes show marks from contacting the drum. Take on a 100 mile run out in the hills to bed in.
net result the front brake still feels dangerously inadequate and the tendons in my forearm are beginning to strain.
I believe that a brake this size should be capable of locking the front wheel. (maybe not repeatedly in short succession, but once at least). I had a similar problem with my Bonneville disc brakes, until I found appropriate pads and this will now lock the front wheel at any speed with two fingers on the lever. (also now very dangerous after spending a day riding an Enfield)
I can only think of one explanation, and that is that the lining materiel does not have a high enough coefficient of friction.
I believe that with any given geometry on a leading shoe there is a maximum coefficient of friction, at which point the servo action just locks the brake on, but I don't believe I am anywhere near approaching that point.
Does anyone know please what materiel is used for the Hitchcocks "improved" shoes ? or what coefficient of friction it has ?
Does anyone know of a materiel with higher coefficient of friction ?
Does anyone know where shoes with this can be obtained or constructed ?
I am guessing that racers might use compounds not suited to road use ?
Many thanks,
Mike