- Mon Aug 01, 2016 3:33 pm
#61200
The Lee-Enfield rifle was made by Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield, London.
The Enfield Cycle Company (Redditch, Worcestershire) did as an engineering firm make some 'defence' components (possibly for RSAF), hence earning the 'Royal' prefix but did not make guns themselves.
Wikipedia is wrong on this point as RSA and RE, and indeed BSA (Birmingham Small Arms, who did make guns, 20,000 Turkish infantry rifles post-Crimea, but nearly put out of business by RSA mass production), are quite different separate companies and not to be confused. The wiki for RE says they made the rifle but the wiki for the Lee-Enfield rifle says otherwise. RSA did not/could not make all their own parts, they would have relied on the likes of the Birmingham Small Arms Trade Association (nascent BSA) and the Enfield Cycle Company for engineering.
The ownership and 'Royal' epithet for the various arsenals is complicated and goes back to control-freak Henry VIII issuing (and withdrawing, with head on spike) monopolies to political friends and allies.
The Enfield Cycle Company (Redditch, Worcestershire) did as an engineering firm make some 'defence' components (possibly for RSAF), hence earning the 'Royal' prefix but did not make guns themselves.
Wikipedia is wrong on this point as RSA and RE, and indeed BSA (Birmingham Small Arms, who did make guns, 20,000 Turkish infantry rifles post-Crimea, but nearly put out of business by RSA mass production), are quite different separate companies and not to be confused. The wiki for RE says they made the rifle but the wiki for the Lee-Enfield rifle says otherwise. RSA did not/could not make all their own parts, they would have relied on the likes of the Birmingham Small Arms Trade Association (nascent BSA) and the Enfield Cycle Company for engineering.
The ownership and 'Royal' epithet for the various arsenals is complicated and goes back to control-freak Henry VIII issuing (and withdrawing, with head on spike) monopolies to political friends and allies.


