This Forum is now CLOSED use the link to get more details viewtopic.php?f=4&t=13925
By James
#5747
I'm a Newbie looking to buy a MKII Interceptor ,and I need help. There seems to be a bunch of negative information on them, But I'm not so sure, are there any good buyers guides?
By Mark M
#53206
Like any machine there are truths, old wives' tales and lies about these bikes. Rather than get me to list what is good and bad, try firing off a few of the things you have heard and I'll try and answer. You can also join a Yahoo Group especially for Inters (and other Twins too,) at https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/RE_Interceptor/info I have a Mk1, Mk2 and as of today, a Mk1A! Your biggest problem is going to be finding one by the way...

REgards, Mark
By James
#53207
got one found! ,so far I have joined the Yahoo group but have not been confirmed.

OK I'll see if I can remember what some are saying. Note this is relating to the last year model series 2's

unreliable oil pumps and oiling in general

unbalanced crank shafts causing vibration

timing gear problems wear ,noisy

fiddly clutches

slow shifting

not real speedy compared to Triumphs and Nortons

By Mark M
#53209
James, all those fall into the "old wives' tales" category. That said, we are talking about a bike built by a small Factory on limited resources 45 years ago. On top of that many of these machines were seriously abused and had short lives ending up falling victim to the Easy Rider chopper craze or ill informed amateur mechanics or tuners. In order: oil pumps are fine, but you might want to (must!) check that the crank oil seal is sound and wired in place. You would do this on ANY Enfield Twin being restarted after a lay up. Crankshafts were balanced at the Factory but some are better than others and any crank work done after the original build can upset it. This applies to any British twin balanced or not. No timing gear problems outside normal maintenance routine. Clutches are not noisy unless the chain is loose (maintenance again,) nor are they fiddly. They are easy to set up if a little heavy in use but you can buy a belt drive and modern Bob Newby clutch if you want. I have both standard and belt, not much to choose between them on the road. Gearbox is slow by the standards of others and is probably the worst thing but can be set up to be reliable or replaced (if you sell a kidney!) with a 5 speed modern box from our Hosts. Seriously, I'm surprised you didn't do this research before you bought it! Lastly, the Inter site is moderated so you will need to wait until Royal approves your membership which won't be long. Did you buy that one from Allan? Looked pretty good to me when I saw it last week. See you over at Yahoo. Scaly, you still with this? Yes, you're right, I now have the set, but I'll pass on the Rickman, genuinely the most uncomfortable bike I have ever ridden! And you are welcome to come and ride, you know how to contact me!

REgards, Mark
By James
#53210
Thanks Mark, got on the Yahoo site, and have been reading for some hours. I have not bought the bike yet and have to make a decision and somewhat of a bike sacrifice in order to get it.
By James
#53218
spent a bunch of time there too :)

the bike is very original , low mileage, very long time owner, nothing missing, never restored, running , apparently well taken care of.
#53249
I would echo Mark M's comments, I have a Mk1A with peanut tank and my brother has a very late MK2 with home market large tank. Lovely bikes and both completely oil tight and reliable. Both clutches are light in operation with no slipping or dragging but I have been meticulous in setting them up. Similarly the 'boxes are slow compared to the AMC box but neither has any false neutrals (unlike a bullet I once had)
As far as performance is concerned I used to own a LR Fastback commando with hi comp pistons and very lumpy cams which was extremely fast (faster than I dared ride it!) it did have the edge on my 1A but only just and the Interceptor was just as smooth but without the benefit of a rubber mounted engine. The Interceptor won hands down on exhaust note though!
If you can afford it (we bought ours when they were unfashionable and relatively inexpensive) and it is as good as you say then I don't think you'd regret your purchase. The only downside mine has it that is quite thirsty and the small tank means a range of around 100 miles so if you get carried away you do have to frantically search for a garage. I have seven bikes and the Interceptor is the only Royal Enfield but it would be the last one I'd part with.

Shop for accessories at Hitchcocks Motorcycles