- Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:13 am
#16288
In my three years+ of Bullet ownership, cant say I've been overly impressed with my mpg figures. I've kept records since Dec-2010 and I've recorded a worst of 46.32 and a best of 92.90. No access to sophisticated Top Gear type recording equipment, but it shows up, more than anything, even at this amateur level, just how inconsistent and "quirky" that each and every Bullet appears to be? I write down the odometer reading and the amount of fuel I've put in at each fill. Not sure if my calculations are the most accurate but this is the weay I do it: Divide miles covered by litres to fill up multiplied by 4.5. eg: Yesterday, tanked up with 9.85 litres. Covered 232 km since last fill. 232 km x .621 = 144.07 miles divided by 9.85 litres = 14.62 x 4.5 = 65.81mpg. Not sure how others calculate it, but I think this way is fairly accurate. A mix of commuting/blasting/short runs/long runs plus warming up, especially in winter time and state of tune, or not, all seem to play a part in giving very inconsistent figures. But if I do record 60+ with the kind of riding I do, I'm fairly happy, especially with todays silly prices. Paid £1.49.9 yesterday for Shell V Power? My bike is a 10,000km 2000 model 500 classic. I'm impressed when I read of chaps on 350's doing over 100mpg. Like to know how they manage that? Diesel is the way forward..............I'll wait until my engine expires before converting mine?
Regards Bullet Train.