- Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:35 pm
#252
...can you help please?
A little while ago, some of you might remember that I posted about ignition failure on my 2006 500 Classic, which turned out to be the points going O/C for no apparent reason. Everyone was v supportive, I replaced the points, and all now seems fine.
Almost...
Since replacing and setting the points gap, two things seem to have happened. Firstly, the idle is much slower than it used to be. I've no real complaints, as the idle is totally reliable, but it is very slow. Secondly, the bike now starts much better, needing much less effort on the kick starter to spin the engine. Why is he complaining, you may ask? Sounds good to me....
Well, yes, but taking these two things together this seems to me to indicate that I may have over-retarded the ignition by bodging the points gap. It is very difficult to check where the point of maximum opening is, as the cam form is basically a lopsided semicircle, with no obvious "highest" point. I think I've got it right, but am not sure.
My question therefore is: is it possible to make that much difference to the ignition timing simply by furkling with the points gap? The bike runs well (albeit feeling a little flat on occasion between 50 and 60). It does not seem to be running hot, exhaust note has a nice tone, exhaust header doesn't seem to be blueing. I have not touched the actual ignition timing plate on the dizzy. Any ideas would be welcome, particularly on reliably finding the optimum points gap position.
Cheers
TimG
...can you help please?
A little while ago, some of you might remember that I posted about ignition failure on my 2006 500 Classic, which turned out to be the points going O/C for no apparent reason. Everyone was v supportive, I replaced the points, and all now seems fine.
Almost...
Since replacing and setting the points gap, two things seem to have happened. Firstly, the idle is much slower than it used to be. I've no real complaints, as the idle is totally reliable, but it is very slow. Secondly, the bike now starts much better, needing much less effort on the kick starter to spin the engine. Why is he complaining, you may ask? Sounds good to me....
Well, yes, but taking these two things together this seems to me to indicate that I may have over-retarded the ignition by bodging the points gap. It is very difficult to check where the point of maximum opening is, as the cam form is basically a lopsided semicircle, with no obvious "highest" point. I think I've got it right, but am not sure.
My question therefore is: is it possible to make that much difference to the ignition timing simply by furkling with the points gap? The bike runs well (albeit feeling a little flat on occasion between 50 and 60). It does not seem to be running hot, exhaust note has a nice tone, exhaust header doesn't seem to be blueing. I have not touched the actual ignition timing plate on the dizzy. Any ideas would be welcome, particularly on reliably finding the optimum points gap position.
Cheers
TimG