- Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:54 pm
#19132
Mine (1992 500) sufferers the same. Like the others, I've learned to live with it, mainly because I don't like to struggle with the springs. However, I think that much of the problem is in the design and manufacture of the springs themselves and their geometric relationship with the frame. They need to be fitted so that the straight wire portion is at the front (as in the last photo in the link referenced by Matt). This ensures that the straight portion has clearance with the tubular ends of the rear frame stays (the ones which are aligned with the rearmost holes in the rear engine plates) when the stand is retracted. However, having replaced mine, I don't think that the straight portion is long enough so that there is a tendency for the coiled portion to clout the tubular ends. This ruins the geometry which relies on the tension ofthe spring being on a line which is above the stand pivot axis when the stand is retracted. I also found that with new springs that the material quality was somewhat lacking so that the washers-between-the-coils technique led to some permanent loss of tension - choose the washer thickness carefully!