Page 1 of 1
Army RE or not army RE, this is the question?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:44 pm
by Scalyback
[center]
SO... It is an army RE, or an RE ridden by an army guy?
save pic for larger version.
Ebay link...
Ebay photo
tabellarius de verbis ostensor gaudium
Army RE or not army RE, this is the question?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 4:21 pm
by PeteF
Well, it doesn't seem to be khaki and from what you can see of the numberplate it's not a WD number so probably not.
Having said that, they did press all sorts of vehicles into use so who knows?
Army RE or not army RE, this is the question?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:33 pm
by Les
It does not look like a army bike to me would the long boots be a clue
Army RE or not army RE, this is the question?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 11:10 pm
by Adrian
It looks like an early post-war model in civvy trim rather than a WDCO. With a glut of M20's, 16H's and G3L's left over from the war, I don't think the British Army ordered any new bikes until the Triumph TRW in the 1950s and the BSA B40 in the 1960's. My money would be on it being the personal property of the soldier in the photo. Happy to be corrected if any military vehicle historian or post-war DR on this forum knows differently. A.