- Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:40 pm
#23363
We can go on forever about the price of this bike vs the price of that bike, but when all is done and dusted the market is governed by the simple rules of supply and demand. Roughly if the price is right and the product is available, people will buy them. Make the price cheaper and people will buy more; up the price and people buy less. If Enfields are struggling to sell their bikes (in the UK) then the price is too much for what you get – simples! Of course how you value ‘what you get’ is a matter of personal choice, which is why a genuine Gold Star could set you back 20 grand or more. And also why I was happy to pay £2,800 for a 1960 Classic (copy) in 2000 but not £4,500 (or whatever it is) now for a Double Swirl, Twin Cranked, Overhead Geared Sprindle Bullet Train . You pays your money and takes your choice. Of course Triumph dealers discount their bikes, even though it may not be Triumph ‘policy’. Dealers chasing sales do it by various means – better part x price, better model for same price, bag full of extras for ‘free’, or pre-registering whereby you get a ‘second hand’ bike with near-zero miles pre-owned by the dealer – aren’t they all? - (where the £5699 Bonnie came from). Incidentally, on the question of prices over the years, in the late 1990s I bought a new Triumph Daytona T595 for £9,999 and yet the current list price for a Daytona 675 is £8,899 (although, illogically from the description, the old bike did have a bigger but slower engine than the new). Finally, on the looks of the ‘new’ Bullet, IMHO I don’t think the new engine apes the look of the old one in the way the Triumph does its predecessor (or for that matter the way the Kawasaki does). Some on here think my bike looks just like the new Bullet (although I have no idea how they know ). I don’t believe the new models show much family resemblance at all, and that, to me is a mistake.