Valve springs and rockers
Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:41 pm
Rocker Failure
I’ve experienced failure so far of several Samrat rocker-sets after ~1000km each in my 1996 500cc Classic. The metal is worn away quickly off the top block and they get noisy – but they are bolted down at the correct 5ft-lbs and when bolted freely rotate. I have the larger exhaust valve, competition valve springs and Mr H’s Performance Cams together with high cap oil pumps.
I have also just seen that the new cams have ridges worn on the faces where the followers ride, and I’ve also found that the cam shaft bearing holes in the timing-chest cover are badly worn so I will have to fit bronze bushes.
I suspect that cruising at ~4000revs (~95kph on standard sprocket in top) the performance valve springs are floating and forming a coil-binding situation even though there is a total of 5-10mm of space between the spring coils before they bind when static. Sounds odd, but I’ve seen video of this on another make bike with description, elsewhere on the web. They say that valve springs can effectively coil-bind at the right harmonic speed even when they are not actually binding in a static test when the valves open. I suspect the cam-face ridges are due to this continual bouncing too as is the wear on the cam bushing.
If so, what to do?
I plan a new set of competition springs and the alloy spring caps.
Should I also take a millimeter off the head below the spring base plate to lengthen the amount of free spring length? Can I actually use the performance cams in the 500cc Classic without spring bind? And how the heck do I get cam bushes in the right place in the timing chest?
But more importantly, why is this happening? Surely I shouldn’t get coil-bind at such low revs?
Is it spring-bounce?
Any advice welcome!
Thanks, ChrisD
I’ve experienced failure so far of several Samrat rocker-sets after ~1000km each in my 1996 500cc Classic. The metal is worn away quickly off the top block and they get noisy – but they are bolted down at the correct 5ft-lbs and when bolted freely rotate. I have the larger exhaust valve, competition valve springs and Mr H’s Performance Cams together with high cap oil pumps.
I have also just seen that the new cams have ridges worn on the faces where the followers ride, and I’ve also found that the cam shaft bearing holes in the timing-chest cover are badly worn so I will have to fit bronze bushes.
I suspect that cruising at ~4000revs (~95kph on standard sprocket in top) the performance valve springs are floating and forming a coil-binding situation even though there is a total of 5-10mm of space between the spring coils before they bind when static. Sounds odd, but I’ve seen video of this on another make bike with description, elsewhere on the web. They say that valve springs can effectively coil-bind at the right harmonic speed even when they are not actually binding in a static test when the valves open. I suspect the cam-face ridges are due to this continual bouncing too as is the wear on the cam bushing.
If so, what to do?
I plan a new set of competition springs and the alloy spring caps.
Should I also take a millimeter off the head below the spring base plate to lengthen the amount of free spring length? Can I actually use the performance cams in the 500cc Classic without spring bind? And how the heck do I get cam bushes in the right place in the timing chest?
But more importantly, why is this happening? Surely I shouldn’t get coil-bind at such low revs?
Is it spring-bounce?
Any advice welcome!
Thanks, ChrisD