- Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:18 pm
#2912
A question ..... why are crankcase halves numbered as a pair
I always thought this was because they were machines as a pair to ensure the critical areas, crankshaft, camshaft and dowels, etc. were aligned.
But ...... (as a member of a well known Norton forum pointed out)
Crankcase bearings are fitted, and hence machined, from the inside. A lot of single cylinder engine have the cams in one half of the crankcase only. Dowels are fitted into the machined face so again cannot be machined with the halves together.
Also both the Norton and Redditch Enfields quoted one side of the crankcase as a spare part
So ..... seems to me we are down to getting the stud holes aligned and the crankcase “deck†height for the barrels. As the stud holes are not a close fit and the deck height is easily machined to match. Also, I have seem perfectly good running engines with mismatched numbers
Does it really matter if the numbers don’t match ?
Richard
I always thought this was because they were machines as a pair to ensure the critical areas, crankshaft, camshaft and dowels, etc. were aligned.
But ...... (as a member of a well known Norton forum pointed out)
Crankcase bearings are fitted, and hence machined, from the inside. A lot of single cylinder engine have the cams in one half of the crankcase only. Dowels are fitted into the machined face so again cannot be machined with the halves together.
Also both the Norton and Redditch Enfields quoted one side of the crankcase as a spare part
So ..... seems to me we are down to getting the stud holes aligned and the crankcase “deck†height for the barrels. As the stud holes are not a close fit and the deck height is easily machined to match. Also, I have seem perfectly good running engines with mismatched numbers
Does it really matter if the numbers don’t match ?
Richard